Gasper Matijasic vs Dimitris Sakellaridis Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In the past six months, Matijasic has managed to win 48.48% of points on their second serve, while Sakellaridis has secured 42.43%. Does Matijasic’s second serve give them an advantage? It could suggest a slight edge.
• For return game stats in the recent period, Matijasic has claimed 52.5% of points on their opponent’s second serve, surpassing Sakellaridis’s 46.38%. On first serve returns, Sakellaridis performs better with 34.13% compared to Matijasic’s 12.9%. Could Sakellaridis’s strong first serve return shift the balance? Possibly.
• When under pressure, Matijasic has been able to save 62.5% of breakpoints, compared to Sakellaridis's 48.64%. Does Matijasic have the upper hand in crucial moments? Potentially so.
• Throughout the last year, Matijasic has not won any matches (0% win rate), while Sakellaridis has a 64.83% win rate (94 wins out of 145 matches). Clearly, Sakellaridis has a more consistent performance.
• Looking at surface performance, both players have their best win rates on different surfaces: Matijasic on Clay (17%) and Sakellaridis on Hard (56%). Despite the disparity, Sakellaridis’s overall win percentage on their preferred surface is notably higher.
• In terms of competition level, Matijasic has been competing mainly in lower-tier tournaments with no wins, whereas Sakellaridis has excelled at a similar level with a substantial win percentage (64.83%). Could this experience difference influence the match outcome? Absolutely.
• Over the past year, Matijasic’s opponents have not been ranked, whereas Sakellaridis faced opponents with an average ranking of 240.32. Does this suggest Sakellaridis has faced tougher competition? Indeed, it’s a significant factor.
• During deciding sets, Matijasic has not won any (0%), contrasting sharply with Sakellaridis, who has a 54% success rate. How might this impact the outcome if a deciding set occurs? Sakellaridis seems likely to handle the situation better.
• Recently, Sakellaridis has been more effective in converting breakpoints (40.15%) compared to Matijasic (33.33%). Is Sakellaridis more adept at capitalizing on key moments? Yes, this may be crucial in close games.

Editorial Prediction (July 16, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing recent performances on the second serve and return games, Matijasic shows a slight advantage in winning points on the second serve and converting their opponents' second serve points. However, when it comes to returning first serves, Sakellaridis is superior.

Under pressure, Matijasic displays better breakpoint defense which could be critical in tight moments. However, Sakellaridis's overall match record and experience against higher-ranked players indicate a more consistent performance level.

The stark contrast in their yearly match win rates—Matijasic at 0% and Sakellaridis at 64.83%—emphasizes Sakellaridis's stronger recent form and adaptability across matches.

While Matijasic may have a slight return game advantage, Sakellaridis's competence in key statistical areas like winning deciding sets and converting breakpoints is evident. Consequently, Sakellaridis is favored to win this matchup, given their stronger overall performance and competitive experience.